President’s address – AGM – 2013

23rd Annual General Meeting – March 24, 2013, – 10 a.m.

(pdf format) Minutes of GA Slides presentation

Continuity and Transition

A year ago when Hans delivered his address to this Assembly – he said that 2011 was a year of continuity and transition. Those words struck me as an apparent dichotomy. Continuity is a state of stability and the absence of disruption; transition is the process or a period of changing from one state or condition to another. The year that was 2012 was both!

The Round Barn, and the events surrounding a marvellous celebration of its centenary was the focus of much energy this past year – itself, a visible and practical example of continuity and transition. We celebrated the end of the Barn’s original vocation – and introduced to our community to the possibilities of a new life of service.

To be the public face of a forward-thinking Association such as ours, which aims to protect our heritage in all its forms, has had both its privileges and reward. The challenges have been minor, thanks to the wonderful support of my fellow Board members. Through this past year, I have had the privilege of observing, participating and listening while I learned the ropes, so to speak. That in itself has been instructive. My occasional notes to you appear to have been well received and I intend to do this on a more regular basis in the future.

Insofar as concerns 2013, the play-list you have come to expect from us is already well started. Excursions, conferences, and publications are standard fare. We are launching, in the coming months, a bi-annual magazine called Histoire Potton History. Bilingual, it will deal with fact, stories and ancestry – subjects sure to fascinate the heritage buff! Look for it in May. You’ll have to shuck out a few bucks for your copy, though. Such delight does not come cheap! You might be interested in knowing that our brochures and publicity folders are among the most popular and best quality at the Bureau d’information touristique on Autoroute 10.

While I am on the subject of publications, please share your opinion as to whether you think the download of our newest web offerings should be free of charge or not. It is a subject the Board will soon be examining.

This May, our delegate to the Congrès of the Fédération des sociétés d’histoire du Québec (FSHQ) in Chicoutimi will be Serge; while I will attend the QAHN general meeting at Stanstead’s Golden Rule Lodge in June. (Quebec Anglophone Heritage Network) Last year, both Serge and I participated at the joint FSHQ-QAHN annual meeting in Sherbrooke where several valuable contacts were established, which are in our interest to maintain. In that same vein, exchanges have taken place locally with Mme Jeanne Morazain, President of Heritage Sutton, and with Lizanne Ryan of the East Bolton Historical Association. Additionally we continue to work with the municipal authorities for the protection of heritage buildings in Potton. Although Hans has resigned from the Board, he will continue to be in charge of this file. We will of course be preparing an exhibition again this year in the Round Barn – this year called Archéologie à Potton, and it goes without saying that we wholeheartedly support the financial campaign about to be launched.

I hope to present a policy for the consideration of our municipal council, which will address our shameful lack of minimal care of our abandoned burial grounds and cemeteries. Several of these are found in Potton. They are neither under the care of the Mansonville Cemetery Company nor Eglise Saint-Cajetan. As a member of this community I find it unacceptable that we do not and have not given these places one modicum of decent respect and care.

2013 promises to be another busy year – already well started; and we could use any help you might feel you can offer. Last year, Bernard made the observation that more help was needed. In case you wondered, that need has not decreased! In fact with Hans departure, we are looking for another member of our team. At the moment, the Board of Directors numbers seven, of a possible nine. Many hands make light work – so perhaps you could write an article for the new magazine, or offer to guide our exhibit in the Round Barn, or something of the sort. Come to one of our meetings – you would be most welcome, though our quarters are a little cramped in the Reilly House.

Quite frankly, what I would find most reassuring is some feedback that we are reflecting your expectations. There is an old « country » expression to the effect that it is the willing horse who gets the most work. You have a Board of Directors comprised of willing horses. Need I say more? Let’s not wear them out!

Which brings me to another and final point : – A great deal of energy was expended by the Association this year in reacting to issues confronting our municipal government. Flash points flared with a fervour and frequency that I have not before witnessed : – concern over the placement of the Bell cell towers, a referendum concerning the revitalization of the Village, the now distant issue of contracts and equipment purchase; the issue of snowmobile races and their location at the intersection of nature conservancy and the use of private land.

Inevitably, and of some concern to me both personally and as the chair of this Association, is a rift – once unspoken but now voiced between native and newcomer – whether resident or not. As I see it, part of this is the growing pains inherent in our evolution – as we transition from a community of « natives » to a preponderant culture devoted to recréo-tourism. How we might help avoid the unnecessary pain if this « rift » widens, preoccupies me. Our strength is in our diversity of community. Community is made up of people, who think and act differently. It takes seasoning to make a good broth, after all!

As a Board of Directors, we are aware of the influence we have in this community. To say otherwise would be disingenuous. The Association is a large and credible voice in Potton. That being the case, then there are incumbent responsibilities. E mails pass between us like a rain of spears on the medieval battlefield – information is quickly collated – action plans coalesce, and within the space of hours – a reaction is formulated – a plan disseminated and we’re off! This rapid response time has become such second nature to us that in some ways, it seems to invigorate the more politically inclined among us. It is seductive in its powerful appeal.

This « action-reaction » has shaped us and is subtlely shaping our Association – particularly as regards our role perceived in the area of civic responsibility. As we tap on computer keyboards, formulating solutions, we in fact, segregate ourselves – distance ourselves from what solves most problems that are human related – which, in my opinion, begins simply by listening and hearing. It’s called talking to each other.

Debate and perceived problems heat and cool with regularity, according to season and circumstance in Potton. This year of municipal elections promises to present its own share of consequential and inconsequential rhetoric for each of us to consider. As individuals, we must be vigilant in this world of competing causes.

With dedicated alacrity we try to mold the evolving Potton in our image – upscale enough to satisfy urban needs – while leaving enough « country » to maintain a colourful flavour. We champion the protection of our landscapes, our prettiest buildings, our town square and les Samedis à Potton. We frequent services and businesses that serve us well – populated for the most part by people born and raised here. The huge danger found in sterilized, solitary and immediate communication is its validation. Without actually talking to each other, and listening, how do we confirm the foundation of what we sense? How else to arrive at workable solutions of communal benefit but to build from the ground up?

As our earliest settlers did over 200 years ago, we come here of our own free will to build a society based on values we hold dear. The heritage this Association strives to champion, reflects the varied ways of life, land use and historical periods, including the recent past; and illustrates our region’s development. Heritage helps maintain a social mix, vitality and identity in our Township, be it old or new, rich or poor. Notwithstanding our recognition of the importance of economic development, I hope that we will, as an Association, continue to insist on preserving the fabric of which « we » are made – that which gives us not only a sense of geography, but also our sense of time, memory and identity – so essential for our spiritual, cultural and creative growth.

Thank you!
Sandra Jewett, March 2013

Posted in Communications | Comments Off

Annual General Meeting, March 24, 2013

POTTON HERITAGE ASSOCIATION

23rd Annual General Meeting, March 24, 2013 – 10 a.m.

All members are invited to the 23rd Annual General Meeting
convened for Sunday, March 24, 2013 at 10 a.m. at the Potton Town Hall

Juice, coffee and biscuits will be served from 9:15 a.m.

Proposed Agenda

  • Opening of the meeting
  • Adoption of the Minutes of the 22nd AGM, April 1, 2012
  • President and Directors’ reports for 2012
  • 2012 Financial Statements and Auditor’s report
  • Budget proposed for 2013
  • Perspective – 2013
  • Election of the Board of Directors
  • Nomination of Auditor
  • Resolution to support the financial campaign for the Round Barn
  • Questions – comments from the Floor

Election of the Board of Directors

Nine members of the Board of Directors are elected for a one-year term.

The following persons have been nominated: Jean-Louis Bertrand, Carol Bishop, Jacques Huppertz, Sandra Jewett, Denis Lamontagne, Serge Normand, Édith Smeesters. Additional nominations, each supported by at least five (5) members of the Association, may also be made. These nominations must be made in writing and received by the Association at least ten days before the vote at the Annual General Meeting, i.e. at the latest March 14, 2013.

Membership Fee Renewal

You may renew your membership at the meeting. In order to vote at the Annual General Meeting, you must be a member in good standing and be present at the meeting. You are cordially invited to a traditional Sugarhouse lunch, catered by Owl’s Bread, which will be served at the conclusion of the Meeting, around 12:30

Price: 20$ per person. Please bring your beverage of choice. Please confirm your presence before March 14, 2013 by calling Édith Smeesters at 450-292-0547 or by e-mail at info@patrimoinepotton.org

For dessert:
Presentation and launch of Potton Heritage Place Names of Potton and More
, written by Sandra Jewett

Jean-Louis Bertrand, Secretary
February 28, 2013

Posted in e-mails | Comments Off

Our beautiful countryside is threatened

Potton Heritage Association invites its members to react to the threat to our valuable landscapes posed by the intended construction of two telecommunication towers in Potton, one of 107 meters and one of 90 meters.

You are invited to make known your personal opinion by writing, before March 8, 2013, to the following :

  • Bell Mobilité
    200, Boul. Bouchard, suite 5CS, Dorval (Québec) H9S 5X5
  • Industrie Canada
    C.D. Howe Building, 235 Queen Street, Ottawa (Ontario) K1A 0H5
  • Potton Township ( Survey )

Here is the copy of the letter sent in the name of Potton Heritage.
Be sure to quote the following reference.

Sandra Jewett
President

Att : Consultation publique -Tours de Communication
– Dossiers F1112 – Dunkin – F1127 – Mansonville
Bell Mobilité 200, Boul. Bouchard, suite 5CS Dorval, QC, H9S 5X5

Potton Heritage Association is a non-profit organization devoted to the protection of Potton heritage, including our rich natural and cultural landscapes, our physical, biological and geological formations, etc. Potton Heritage Association was founded 23 years ago, and counts a membership of over two hundred individuals.

Our observations and remarks are based on the Charte des paysages estriens which was adopted by the municipal Council of Potton. Some of the dispositions contained therein include :

— citizens have the right of access to information held by public authorities in relation to sites of heritage value; and to participate in the decision making process pertaining to the landscapes which they, by their activities, have helped to shape.

— The engagement by the signatory to reconcile economic development with the protection of our environment, which includes our natural landscapes, while ensuring coherence of decision, action and intervention; to be particularly prudent in interventions which may negatively impact these landscapes; to promote a concerted planning process that, from the outset, includes citizen participation in the decision making and implementation phases of projects involving landscapes.

« Le manuel des bonnes pratiques pour les paysages », a practical user guide to complement the Charter, acknowleges the great challenge which the construction and positioning of antennas presents. It favours using sites of minor visual interest and suggests using strategies that will allow the harmonious integration of these structures into the natural landscape. The manual suggests that by integrating these antennas into existing structures, where architectural criteria permits, visual impact is minimized. In addition, the Guide notes Industry Canada requires that promoters follow a process obliging them to study the sharing of existing towers or existing infrastructure before proposing new tower construction.

Context :
Le Schéma d’Aménagement et de Développement (SAD) de la MRC Memphrémagog identifies in its objectives « the structuring role played by quality landscapes ». As such, the protection of same is essential.

Insofar as concerns the Township of Potton, its landscapes are a collective asset and an important ressource in the development of tourism. This very message has long been trumpeted by the Heritage Association.

The Townships Trail (Le chemin des Cantons), created five years ago by Tourisme Estrie, crosses our Township and attracts thousands of tourists each year. The Trail offers the tourist an opportunity to discover our magnificent natural landscapes, including those to be found on Route 243 as well as the chemin de la Vallée Missisquoi.

Comments:
Without question the installation of communication towers in the areas now proposed by Bell Mobility will be of negative impact generally, and will compromise the panoramic views promoted by the Chemin des Cantons, in particular. As a consequence, Bell should modify its plans, with a view to eliminating or minimizing as much as possible the negative impact on our landscapes.

Argument
— Industry Canada prescribes that : « …the promoters are responsible for ensuring that the network of antennas are installed and operated in such a manner as to respect the local environment. »

— In Potton,a signatory to the Charte and its accompanying manual, the dispositions are clear : « The question of the visual impact which this equipment has on our landscapes is foremost, particularly since the multiplication of such antennas is only beginning, especially in rural areas. » « The challenge : to install antennas on sites of least impact on the landscapes and to use strategies for these structures, if they are necessary, to integrate these harmoniously into their surroundings. » In this sense, harmonious means structures where the parts are well proportioned and visually pleasing.

— Did Bell Mobility evaluate sites permitting such a harmonious integration? Did the company evaluate the possibilty of placing antennas on several smaller structures, more easily camouflaged and dispersed, instead of optining for these very visible, imposing structures?

— Industry Canada obliges the promoter to work with the authorities responsible for territorial land use. In the present context, this means the Municipality of the Township of Potton and the MRC de Memphrémagog.

— Has Bell Mobility taken into account the land use plan of the MRC? If not, why not? If yes, then how did the Company demonstrate conformity to the current Land Use Plan for the MRC, particularly as regards the integration of these structures within sensitive landscapes. « Encourage the hamonization of architecture with the environment while respecting the natural and rual framework. »

Dunkin project, File F1112 :
Bell Mobility documents submitted to the Municipality indicate that in the summer of 2012, two sites were retained by the Company for the installation of towers, the first of these south of the Missisquoi River, near a private road (Site 1) and a second close to Chemin des Pruniers north-west of Dunkin. (site 2) Bell’s visual simulations, shown from chemin de la Vallée Missisquoi, clearly indicate that a tower on Site 1 would be of far less visual impact than Site 2. Why was Site 1 rejected by Bell Mobility? We strongly recommend a renewed consideration of this site.

The proposed tower would be 107 meters high. The placement of the proposed tower is within the perimeter of a zone designated as « natural landscape of superior interest ». This designation is reserved for landscapes of exceptional panoramic beauty. Why does Bell Mobility insist upon visually scarring this vista?

Mansonville project, chemin White, File F1127 :
The documents in File F1127 furnished by Bell Mobility note that a 90 meter towner is proposed for this site, thus compromising the panoramic views to the west of Mansonville. An extract of the topographical map furnished by Bell Mobility, requested by the Association, indicates an extremely confined site. Are there alternatives?

Planning the construction of communication towers within available options :
Bell Mobility chose to present its projects in a piecemeal fashion as opposed to revealing the total project. They chose not to address themselves to the parties concerned, of which, the MRC de Memphrémagog, in order to plan a harmonious integration of these structures within the territory. We cite as proof, the example of a tower within the Municipality of East Bolton, at its border with Potton. This tower is sited in close proximity to an designated ecological reserve, La mine-aux-Pipistrelles, devoted to bats designated threatened or vulnerable. Did Bell Mobility obtain the permission of federal and Quebec authorities, both of which are preoccupied with the preservation of threatened species? As the mine itself is located in Potton, was the Municipality of Potton consulted?

Bell Mobility should adequately inform not only the population of Potton but also the MRC concerned about its overall planning and insertion of communication towers in the territories concerned. What are the population numbers to be served by these 27 to 35 storey communication towers? Just how many towers are necessary to serve Potton? Was the alternative of satellite transmission investigated? Other companies offer satellite coverage. Why does Bell Mobility not make share-agreements with other carriers or use their own existing Bell satellite network?

We understand that such planning requires co-ordination between many parties, including competing wireless carriers, governmental authorities responsible for the territorial management, as well as local civic and regional authorities implicated in the conservation of natural heritage and the health of its citizens. The guide to good practices, mentionned above, suggests « that is is much to the advantage of communities to develop plans and implementaion strategies for telecommunications networks » This is a wise recommendation which Bell Mobilité should also integrate into its consultation process and apply in Potton.

Can we avoid the proliferation of these imposing structures? We submit that the network projected by Bell Mobility will impact our society and particularly our landscapes such that the insertion of a network must be made with respect to the best interest of all Pottonites and not exclusively in the interest of Bell Mobility, its clients and shareholders.

Considering what is known of the files submitted, we will advise our members and fellow citizen in Potton to oppose zoning changes desired by Bell Mobilité and to request a referendum on the question.

Respectfully submitted

Hans Walser,
Member of the Board of Directors, Potton Heritage Association and spokesperson for the Association on the subject of Telecommunication towers.

c. c. Jacques Marcoux, maire de la municipalité du Canton de Potton; Jacques Demers, préfet, MRC Memphrémagog; Industrie-Canada; Conseil d’administration de l’APP et Membres de l’APP, Conseil d’administration du Groupe bénévole municipal de Potton (GBMP).

(PDF Version)

 

Posted in e-mails | Comments Off